{"id":851,"date":"2015-03-29T20:21:20","date_gmt":"2015-03-30T03:21:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/?p=851"},"modified":"2015-03-30T15:51:03","modified_gmt":"2015-03-30T22:51:03","slug":"love-rejected-from-the-book-tragic-stories-disguised-as-jokes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/love-rejected-from-the-book-tragic-stories-disguised-as-jokes\/","title":{"rendered":"Love, Rejected (from the book &#8220;Tragic Stories Disguised as Jokes&#8221;)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My petition for love was denied by the central authority which handles such petitions.<br \/>\nIt used to be that these standard rejections came by certified mail and were printed in ornate script on fine paper. Today they all come by text message. Still, they carry with them the same tradition. They are summary rejections. And they are form letters.<\/p>\n<p>If someone were to travel forward from 100 years in the past they would recognize them immediately. \u201cThat is a standard rejection of a petition for love, sent by the bureau which handles such,\u201d they would say. But then they would add, \u201cWhere is the ornate script and fine paper?\u201d And they would look sad. Because 100 years ago we were a more tactile people appreciative of ornate flourishes. Even if there was, as today, a shortage of love.<br \/>\nA traveler from 500 years earlier would not recognize either rejection. Modern love had not yet been invented. It is a bittersweet fact.<\/p>\n<p>At least in the electronic age one need not stand in the terrible lines at the petition office. As early as a decade ago people still had to queue up in line for hours to qualify for the chance at rejection. People did this, as today, for the slim hope that their petition would be granted. <\/p>\n<p>The form rejection lists a reason. The reason is never revealed outright but instead a reference is made to a number. The number corresponds to a large reference which holds all the reasons rejection may be made. There are 100 volumes in question. The reasons for rejection are, some say, innumerable, but in reality they mostly break down to endless variations on three reasons which no one likes to discuss. Most people do not bother to look up the reference number listed in their rejection.<br \/>\nMine was V.21.12.91. \u201cRejected for tendency to look up and contemplate facts and figures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>We all know people whose petitions for love have been, or seem to have been, granted. It is commonly thought that some petitions are granted only to make the system seem viable. In fact, these successful petitions have a high failure rate. There is a complaint bureau. It is housed on the top floor of the tallest building in the world. There is no elevator. When you arrive at the single window you find it empty with a sign which says: \u201cNo Returns.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There has always been a shortage of love and that is why a system of rationing has been set up. To preserve love by careful denial.<br \/>\nThe truth is there has been no new love manufactured since 1992. All the love in the world is used. And second-hand love has a resale value which can only be classified as pitiful.<\/p>\n<p>[amazon asin=B00S481ULS&#038;template=iframe image]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My petition for love was denied by the central authority which handles such petitions. It used to be that these standard rejections came by certified mail and were printed in ornate script on fine paper. Today they all come by text message. Still, they carry with them the same tradition. They are summary rejections. And they are form letters. If someone were to travel forward from 100 years in the past they would recognize them immediately. \u201cThat is a standard rejection of a petition for love, sent by the bureau which handles such,\u201d they would say. But then they would&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[13,7,12,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-links","category-my-books","category-writing"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3u13S-dJ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":419,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/love-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":0},"title":"Love, Rejected","author":"David Raffin","date":"September 5, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"By\u00a0David Raffin My petition for love was denied by the central authority which handles such petitions. It used to be that these standard rejections came by certified mail and were printed in ornate script on fine paper. Today they all come by text message. Still, they carry with them the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/writing\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4016,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/paper-trails\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":1},"title":"Paper Trails","author":"David Raffin","date":"August 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On the poles jutting from the sidewalks were papers plastered upon papers. Advising of modern performances and things lost. Guitar lessons. Cultural gyrations listed in the most ephemeral manner. With time, sun, rain, the older papers remained on the poles but became washed out. Bleached. Unreadable. Forgotten. Like a book\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/writing\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/IMG_7020.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1242,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/a-meeting-of-the-monsters\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":2},"title":"A meeting of the monsters","author":"David Raffin","date":"August 18, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \"No, I don't like it,\" said a monster. \"Then no one shall have it!\" said another monster, who was a friend, a foul-weather friend, of the first monster. \"Anyone who complains shall have their sanity questioned!\" \"Hear, hear!\" said the number one monster, who finally felt validated by taking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/img_0415.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1237,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/try-not-to-be-diminished\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":3},"title":"Try not to be diminished","author":"David Raffin","date":"July 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"I like to do math It puts me back On that evil left handed path For what is math That Wicked art Which reduces all to that Numeric flow chart It sets one and one apart Ripped from each other With a cold math heart And joins together randoms Thereby\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;My books&quot;","block_context":{"text":"My books","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/my-books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2670,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/frank-talk-abounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":4},"title":"Frank Talk Abounds","author":"David Raffin","date":"June 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"A story of mid childhood. \u201cSomeone Else\u2019s Memories\u201d from the album \u201cThe Politics of Desire\u201d by Revolution Void licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. Winner Winner! by Kevin MacLeodLink: https:\/\/incompetech.filmmusic.io\/song\/4630-winner-winner-License: https:\/\/filmmusic.io\/standard-license Thinking Music by Kevin MacLeodLink: https:\/\/incompetech.filmmusic.io\/song\/4522-thinking-musicLicense: https:\/\/filmmusic.io\/standard-license Grateful acknowledgment thereof.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;My books&quot;","block_context":{"text":"My books","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/my-books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":829,"url":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/representations-of-muhammad-for-charlie-hebdo\/","url_meta":{"origin":851,"position":5},"title":"Representations of Muhammad [for Charlie Hebdo]","author":"David Raffin","date":"January 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"in, out, and about the box [for Charlie Hebdo] If a cartoonist draws Muhammad, he or she invariably will frame that drawing between four straight lines, a graphic representation of a box. Herein lies a problem: Nobody puts Muhammad in a box. The Muhammad in a Box was a toy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books","link":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=851"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":855,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/851\/revisions\/855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidraffin.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}